markets

Bitcoin Slides Under $60K, Eyes Back-to-Back Quarterly Loss

Bitcoin dropped below $60,000 and is on pace for a rare consecutive quarterly decline, a signal traders can't ignore.

Bitcoin just broke below $60,000, and the timing couldn't be worse. The leading cryptocurrency is now on track to post back-to-back quarterly losses — a rare occurrence that historically rattles both retail and institutional confidence in the asset class.

Consecutive down quarters don't happen often in Bitcoin's relatively short lifespan, and when they do, the market pays attention. It signals that the usual 'buy the dip' crowd is either tapped out or sitting on their hands, waiting for a cleaner entry point before committing fresh capital.

Read more Amkor Technology Called a 'Secret Weapon' in Chip Race →

The drop below the $60K level is more than just a psychological gut-punch. That price zone had been viewed by many traders as a key support floor, and losing it opens the door to a deeper retest of lower levels. Watch how price action behaves on any bounce — weak recoveries from here would be a bearish tell.

Macro headwinds haven't helped. Risk assets broadly have been under pressure, and Bitcoin hasn't decoupled from that narrative the way crypto bulls had hoped. If you're holding, know your levels. If you're watching from the sidelines, patience is a position too.

Continue reading at CoinDesk

Continue reading at CoinDesk →

Frequently Asked Questions

Q.Why is Bitcoin falling below $60,000 significant?

The $60,000 level has been widely watched as a key psychological and technical support zone. Losing it raises concern about a deeper price decline.

Q.How rare are back-to-back quarterly losses for Bitcoin?

Consecutive quarterly losses are uncommon in Bitcoin's history, making the current situation a notable bearish signal for market participants.

Q.What does a second straight quarterly loss mean for Bitcoin investors?

It suggests sustained selling pressure rather than a short-term dip, and it can weigh on both retail and institutional confidence in the asset.

More in markets →