markets

Crypto Hacks Down 47% in H1 But Q2 Surge Tells a Darker Story

Hack volumes dropped nearly half year-over-year, yet Q2 alone saw a brutal 59% spike. Don't get comfortable.

The headline number looks good — crypto hacks fell 47% in the first half of the year. But peel back one layer and the picture gets ugly fast. Q2 exploit losses rocketed 59% quarter-on-quarter to $807.5 million, erasing a lot of the goodwill that a quieter Q1 had built.

Two names drove the carnage: KelpDAO and Drift Protocol. Both were hit by North Korean state-sponsored hackers, the same crew that has drained billions from the crypto ecosystem over the past several years. This isn't random opportunism — it's organized, nation-state-level theft, and it targets protocols you actually use.

Read more VanEck's SMH ETF Is Up 64% in 2025 Without Owning Apple →

CertiK's data makes the point bluntly: a lower yearly average can mask a worsening trend hiding inside the numbers. If Q2 is the new baseline, H2 could be painful. The 47% drop in H1 is a statistical artifact as much as a genuine improvement — one big quarter wipes out months of progress in a single reporting cycle.

For traders and DeFi participants, the takeaway is simple. Audit reports and TVL size are not shields. North Korean hackers don't care how many security badges a protocol displays on its landing page. Position sizing, protocol diversification, and keeping serious capital off-chain remain your best risk management tools until this threat level changes.

Continue reading at Cointelegraph

Continue reading at Cointelegraph →

Frequently Asked Questions

Q.How much was stolen in crypto hacks in Q2?

Crypto exploits totaled $807.5 million in Q2, a 59% increase compared to the previous quarter, according to CertiK.

Q.Who was behind the KelpDAO and Drift Protocol hacks?

Both KelpDAO and Drift Protocol were exploited by North Korean hackers, who continue to be among the most active and dangerous threat actors in the crypto space.

Q.Why did crypto hacks fall 47% in H1 if Q2 was so bad?

The 47% drop is a year-over-year comparison for the full first half, meaning a relatively quieter Q1 pulled the average down even as Q2 saw a sharp surge in stolen funds.

More in markets →